MCQ Subject: Logical Reasoning & Syllogism

Statements: 1. No cats are birds. 2. All parrots are birds. Which conclusion is definitely true?

If no historians are philosophers and some philosophers are not linguists, which conclusion is definitely valid?

If all mathematicians are logical thinkers and some logical thinkers are philosophers, which conclusion is most accurate?

An argument states: ‘Since all efficient workers are early risers and all early risers drink tea, therefore all tea drinkers are efficient workers.’ Which logical fallacy does this argument commit?

In a debate, a speaker argues, ‘Candidate Z has never held public office, so Z’s economic policies will surely fail.’ Which of the following best identifies the fallacy in this statement?

Which of the following syllogisms is valid if ‘All mammals are warm-blooded’ and ‘All whales are mammals’?

Given: 1. All novelists are literati. 2. No literati are athletes. Which conclusion is logically valid?

Which logical fallacy occurs when an argument assumes a cause-and-effect relationship between two events merely because they occur in sequence?

Identify the logical fallacy in the statement: ‘Our new software must be more efficient than the competitor’s because it was developed by a larger team.’

If all A are B and all C are A, which of the following can be logically concluded?