MCQ Subject: Critical Reasoning

A new policy allows bank branches to operate without a manager present if they have at least 5 experienced staff members. Previously, a manager’s presence was mandatory regardless of staff experience. Which of the following is the most likely direct consequence of this policy change?

A regional SBI branch faces a dilemma: allocate its limited community development funds to either support a local school in dire need of infrastructure or invest in a financial literacy program for underprivileged youth. Which of the following approaches would be the most ethically justifiable decision-making criterion in this context?

An argument concludes that ‘increasing the number of SBI PO positions will lead to improved customer service’ because ‘more staff can handle more customers simultaneously.’ Which of the following, if true, strengthens the assumption underlying this argument?

In an argument concluding that ‘Since our company uses only eco-friendly packaging, our products are preferred by environmentally conscious consumers,’ which of the following is an unstated assumption?

In an argument, a political candidate’s personal wealth is cited as evidence that they cannot understand the struggles of the common people. Which logical fallacy does this argument commit?

If all professional athletes are disciplined and some cyclists are professional athletes, which conclusion is most logically supported?

If all banks are financial institutions and some fintech companies are banks, which conclusion is necessarily true?

An argument concludes that ‘All employees must undergo regular refresher training’ because ‘Employees who undergo regular refresher training are more productive’. Which of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument?

An argument claims, ‘Since only our successful entrepreneurs have attended the Management Workshop, attending the Management Workshop is necessary for entrepreneurial success.’ What is the primary flaw in this argument?

Identify the logical fallacy in this argument: ‘You can’t trust Dr. Singh’s climate change research because she drives a gas-guzzling SUV.’